Sales Guide · Tennessee · Memphis Light, Gas & WaterInternal rep reference

Top Tier — Tennessee Battery Sales Reference

Memphis Light, Gas & Water · Memphis & Shelby County

Sales reference for reps working MLGW territory. This is the deep reference — how to sell it up top, full utility detail below. Tennessee is TVA country — a federal wholesale authority behind some hundred and fifty local power companies, no state net-metering statute, no retail choice — and MLGW is the LPC where the least is published: the largest three-service municipal utility in America — electric, gas, and water under one roof — whose distributed-generation interconnection process exists in its charge schedules, but whose export compensation terms appear nowhere a customer can read them. So this territory runs on a discipline most sales organizations don't have: until MLGW's terms are confirmed from primary sources, our proposals claim zero bill savings. Not small savings, not estimated savings — zero, stated on the proposal itself. What we know for certain: MLGW's structure is TVA wholesale plus MLGW's retail markup; a distributed-generation interconnection process exists with its own charges; solar customers in TVA territory carry the Grid Access Charge; and Green Power Providers closed at the end of 2019, so legacy participants hold contract terms we read before quoting anything. What we sell in the meantime is everything a battery does that no export rate touches: backup power in a city whose ice storms are regional legend and whose restorations have historically run long, protection against the rate curve on power you'd otherwise buy, and the takeover of an orphaned system. When MLGW's terms confirm, the proposal updates — and because we quoted zero, every confirmed cent is upside the customer was told about in advance.


What kind of market this is

MLGW is a confirmation-pending market run on the zero-claim register — the most-pending in our book: proposals show the with-battery bill unchanged and state why, the confirmed facts (the TVA-plus-markup structure, the DG interconnection process's existence, the Grid Access Charge, the GPP screen) are told plainly, and the sale stands on resilience, rate-position, and the takeover — with every future confirmed cent positioned as disclosed upside. Five defining facts:

  1. Almost everything is pending here — so the claim is zero, and we say that with a straight face. MLGW's Schedule of Charges documents a distributed-generation interconnection process — the process exists — but no export compensation rate or netting basis appears in any published document our research could reach. Both the residential rate card and the solar terms are being pinned from primary sources — and until they pin, our proposals claim no bill savings at all. The with-battery bill renders unchanged, with the explanation on the page.
  2. The confirmed structure is told first. MLGW rides TVA wholesale plus MLGW's retail markup — the same architecture as every TVA LPC. Its DG interconnection process carries its own charges (documented in the Schedule of Charges; specifics confirmed at application). Solar customers in TVA territory carry the Grid Access Charge — tiered by average usage, $4.50/month at or below 500 kWh, $7.33 from 501 to 2,000 (pinned from a TVA-LPC rate schedule; higher tiers possible, tool carries current). A battery removes none of it, and the customer hears it from us.
  3. The GPP screen comes before any conversation about terms. TVA's Green Power Providers closed December 31, 2019. Legacy participants hold premium contracted terms that vary by contract — read the customer's paperwork before discussing their economics. Everyone else is on KUB's current arrangement, whatever its cents turn out to be.
  4. No VPP, no plan to shop, no phantom money. No VPP routes any of our hardware in Tennessee. KUB is a monopoly LPC — no retail choice exists. No Tennessee battery rebate, no state credit (no state income tax to credit against), sales tax ~9.25% applies with no exemption found — priced honestly — and the federal ITC expired at the end of 2025. The no-program list is given in full, unprompted.
  5. What we sell today is what's true today. Backup power in Memphis — where the February 2023 ice storm is recent memory, ice-and-wind events are the city's signature outage drivers, and restorations have historically run long — plus the rate-position argument on the power the customer keeps buying, plus the takeover of a system whose installer is likely gone. The zero-claim proposal is the trust move: when MLGW's terms confirm, the projection updates, and the customer was told exactly that at signing.

Your lead is the zero-claim discipline itself — it's the most credible sentence in the appointment. "Until your utility's export rate is confirmed from their own documents, this proposal claims no bill savings — here's what the battery does that no export rate touches" is an opener no competitor in this territory will match. The confirmed costs go first (the fee, the GAC), the GPP question opens the appointment, and the mountains close it.

Default configuration: backup-capable — the resilience case IS the bill case here, for now.

Confirm pricing, configuration, and GPP status in the tool before quoting — and never quote an export rate or savings figure in this territory until the tool itself carries one.


PART A — The Pitch (Problem → Solution → Urgency → Close)

The spine is multiple beats per section: customer headline + statement + rep layer (+ objection where noted). Beats marked (BACKUP ONLY) render only for backup config. The GPP screen opens the appointment; the zero-claim discipline governs every number.

The Problem

Your solar's export terms aren't published anywhere you can read them — and we're the ones telling you that. MLGW's documents show a distributed-generation interconnection process exists, but no export rate or netting terms appear in anything public. We're pinning the real arrangement from primary sources, and until we have, we won't put a savings number on paper. What we can tell you today: don't assume your excess is offsetting your bill — in TVA territory, most arrangements sell excess at a fraction of retail or not at all.

Rep layer: The honest-uncertainty opener — the register's defining move, at its purest here. What's CONFIRMED: the TVA-plus-markup structure; that a DG interconnection process exists (Schedule of Charges); the GAC. What's NOT: the export terms AND the exact rate card — and the rep says "being confirmed," never an estimate. The trust mechanics: a rep who says "I don't know yet, and here's what I refuse to guess about" owns the room for everything else. Objection — "Can't you just estimate it?" No — and that's the point. TVA-territory arrangements run sub-retail or uncompensated, but a pattern isn't your number, and this company doesn't quote numbers it hasn't verified.

You pay real charges either way. MLGW's interconnection process carries its own charges — documented in their Schedule of Charges, confirmed exactly at application — and solar customers in TVA territory carry the Grid Access Charge, four fifty to seven thirty-three a month. You're hearing it from us first.

Rep layer: The confirmed-costs beat — the told-first pattern: DG interconnection charges exist (Schedule of Charges — specifics at application, never guessed) + GAC $4.50/$7.33 (TVA-LPC rate schedule, primary). Never claim a battery removes either. The honest use: the charges sharpen self-supply — "you're paying for the interconnection either way; power you store and use yourself is the one flow nobody meters, purchases, or surcharges."

Your system is orphaned. Whoever installed your solar is likely gone, merged, or unreachable — especially after so many installers folded when the federal tax credit expired at the end of 2025. If something goes wrong, there's no one accountable. You own the system and the risk.

Rep layer: Standard orphaned-system beat. Ask who installed it and whether they'd answer a service call.

Your inverter is on the clock. Your inverter is several years old. When it fails out of warranty, that's about $3,500 to $5,000 out of pocket — and your system produces nothing until it's replaced, typically 4 to 8 weeks.

Rep layer: Standard inverter beat. SolarEdge ~12-yr warranty, real failure 8–15 yrs; Enphase 25-yr, real issues 10–20.

(BACKUP ONLY) Memphis ice is regional legend — and your panels shut off with the first downed line. The February 2023 ice storm is recent memory here, wind events ride the river corridor, and this city's restorations have historically run long. Grid-tied panels produce nothing in an outage. A battery keeps your critical systems running, and recharges from the sun through restoration.

Rep layer: Renders ONLY for backup config — and in the zero-claim register, THE beat. Honest-scale discipline: Memphis's pattern is real (Feb 2023 ice storm = recent significant regional event; wind events; historically long restorations) but MLGW-specific outage counts are unconfirmed — event-and-pattern framing only, never an invented figure. The city's own memory tells it.

The Solution

A battery does its three biggest jobs no matter what KUB's export rate turns out to be — and we'll show you the zero on purpose. Today's proposal claims no bill savings, in writing, because your utility's export terms aren't confirmed — and everything on it is therefore something you can bank: backup power through the storms this region actually gets, insulation from the rate curve on the power you keep buying, and a single accountable company behind your whole system. When KUB's rate confirms, your projection updates — and since we quoted zero, every confirmed cent lands as upside you were told about.

Monthly Cost Chart and Net Bill Breakdown render here — with the with-battery bill unchanged and the confirmation note displayed.

Rep layer: THE core cure beat — zero-claim edition. The proposal RENDERS the unchanged bill and the explainer; the rep owns it in words before the screen shows it ("you'll see zero savings on this page — here's why that's the honest version"). The stack, in order: resilience (the whole bill case for now) + rate-position (structural: whatever exports earn, self-supply beats it — no cents attached) + takeover. The upside framing: zero-quoted means confirmation is pure disclosed upside — the anti-overquote position, stated as the feature it is.

(BACKUP ONLY) It keeps your home running when the grid goes down. Powers your essentials — refrigerator, medical devices, connectivity, heat or cooling circuits by season — through an outage, and recharges from solar daily for as long as restoration takes.

Rep layer: The resilience cure beat. Memphis honesty: ice is the marquee (Feb 2023 fresh), wind the second act; historically long restorations make the multi-day sizing conversation the honest default; winter-sun recharge expectations set honestly.

We take it over. Top Tier becomes the single point of contact for your entire system — a new 10-year workmanship warranty, the 5-year Align Solar Protection contract ($0 deductible, non-transferable), and manufacturer warranty coordination.

Rep layer: Answers the orphaned-system problem. Transfers: workmanship with written consent; Align non-transferable; manufacturer per OEM terms.

Thousands you don't pay. The $11K+ Hidden Costs Avoided bundle — built into the takeover, not sold as extras.

Rep layer: Reframes total cost. "Your payment buys the battery plus warranty plus service plus inverter-replacement coverage — over $11K of value."

And whatever TVA and MLGW decide next, your stored power is yours. Your rates are set by your LPC inside TVA's framework — no plan to shop, no commission docket, just the utility's board and TVA's wholesale math upstream. The Grid Access Charge came out of that machinery once already. Power you store and use yourself answers to none of it.

Rate Justification + Own vs Rent render here.

Rep layer: The independence beat — TVA edition: monopoly LPC, board-set retail inside a federal framework; the GAC as evidence the machinery can add solar-specific charges (structural note, never a prediction). 25-yr scenarios: conservative 3%, moderate 5%, aggressive 7% — consumption-rate backdrop, never battery savings.

Urgency

The honest clocks — a mountain season, and a confirmation that cuts both ways.

The storm clock. Memphis's ice keeps its own calendar, and 2023 is recent memory. A battery in place before the cold months is heat and refrigeration; one ordered after an ice event is a backorder behind the city — in the town where restorations already run long.

Rep layer: THE urgency in the zero-claim register — preparedness-framed, terrain-told, no invented counts.

The confirmation clock — honest in both directions. MLGW's terms will confirm, and when they do, projections update. If you sign at today's zero-claim quote, the confirmation is upside. That's not pressure — it's just the arithmetic of quoting the floor.

Rep layer: The one register-specific clock — handled carefully: this is NOT a deadline and is never framed as one; it's the disclosed-upside structure of zero-quoting, stated once, factually. A rep who turns "terms will confirm" into urgency theater is manufacturing a clock — the discipline holds.

What is NOT a clock: a net-metering deadline. Tennessee has no net-metering statute, MLGW's arrangement has no sunset, and Green Power Providers closed back in 2019 — that's history and a screen, not a countdown. Anyone selling a Tennessee solar deadline is importing another state's pitch.

Rep layer: The anti-manufacture rule, TVA edition.

The Close

  1. Ask the GPP question, then verify credit + configuration. "Were you ever enrolled in TVA's Green Power Providers program?" — a yes routes to the contract-read path before anything else. Then the credit check and backup vs self-consumption config.
  2. Walk the zero-claim page in words before it renders. "You'll see no savings number on this proposal — your utility's export terms aren't confirmed, and we don't quote what we haven't verified. Here's what you're buying instead, and here's what happens when the terms confirm."
  3. Customer reads and signs the service agreement. Walk the disclosures honestly — the unpublished export terms stated as exactly that, the interconnection charges confirmed at application, the GAC, the sales-tax reality, and the no-program economics.
  4. Complete the Welcome Call. Finalizes the sale and sets expectations for installation.

Standing Rules (Do NOT Violate)

Go get the sale. A battery is a strong product — clean energy, independence, backup, long-term savings, and in Texas real VPP income. A customer who wants one for any honest reason is a good sale. We never walk away over price or low savings — that's the customer's call. Do right by the customer, protect the company, be honest.


PART B — The Deep Reference

1. Orientation

2. How the MLGW Bill Works — What's Pinned and What Isn't

  1. Consumption: MLGW's residential rate rides TVA wholesale plus MLGW's retail markup — the rate card was not extractable from published pages in our grounding passes and is being pinned; the tool carries the working figure, flagged. TVA-LPC energy rates in this class run around 12¢ all-in — context, never a quote.
  2. The Grid Access Charge: TVA's DG surcharge — $4.50/month (≤500 kWh average) / $7.33 (501–2,000), pinned from a TVA-LPC rate schedule; higher tiers possible (tool carries current). Told first, always.
  3. The interconnection process: documented in MLGW's Schedule of Charges (Distributed Generation Interconnection Charges section) — the process and its charges exist; specifics are confirmed at application, never assumed.
  4. Exports: no export compensation rate or netting basis appears in any published MLGW document our research could reach — being pinned through MLGW customer service and the interconnection application packet; unconfirmed; never estimated aloud.
  5. What this means for a battery, exactly: in TVA territory the pattern runs sub-retail or uncompensated — either way, stored self-supply beats exporting structurally. The terms are the unconfirmed part, so the claim is zero until they aren't.

Why this matters for the pitch: the register inverts the usual failure mode — instead of a number that might be wrong, the rep carries a discipline that can't be: confirmed facts told first, the unknown named as unknown, and the zero on the page as the proof.

3. Solar at KUB — Confirmed Mechanism, Pending Rate, Zero-Claim Discipline

Everything below distinguishes pinned from pending — that distinction IS the register.

4. Rate Reality + The Zero-Claim Math

ValueSource
Retailbeing pinned — tool carries the working figure, flagged (TVA-LPC class context ~12¢ — context, never a quote)grounding TODO
Grid Access Charge$4.50 (≤500 kWh avg) / $7.33 (501–2,000) — told FIRST; higher tiers possibleTVA-LPC rate schedule (primary)
Interconnectionprocess + charges exist (Schedule of Charges, DG section) — specifics at application, never assumedMLGW Schedule of Charges
Export termsUNCONFIRMED — nothing published; being pinned; never estimated aloud; proposals claim $0 savings until pinnedMLGW CS / application packet (pending)
GPP legacyclosed 12/31/2019; contract-specific premium terms — READ FIRSTTVA / grounding
Programsnone — no VPP in TN (no hardware routes), no rebate, no retail choiceTN grounding
Taxessales tax ~9.25% applies, no exemption found (priced honestly); no property exemption found; no state income tax → no credit; federal ITC expired 12/31/2025TN DOR / grounding

What drives the MLGW pitch (named, honest):

  1. The discipline itself. Zero on the page, by choice, with the reason printed — and in the most-pending market in our book, it's the ONLY credible artifact.
  2. The ice. February 2023 is recent memory, and this city's restorations run long — the case tells itself.
  3. The structure told first. TVA-plus-markup, the interconnection charges, the GAC — from our mouth, before the bill says it.

Documented vs. speculation (say this right):

5. Incentives & Programs

6. System Rescue Value — The System Takeover

This applies to any customer with existing solar — and it's identical across every Top Tier market. These are takeover facts, not TX-specific.

The Orphaned Solar Customer Problem. Many Texas solar customers installed during the 2019–2024 growth years and now face:

The Inverter Failure Reality. Inverters are the weakest link. Panels last 25–30 years; the inverter fails much sooner.

What Top Tier's takeover provides (formalized through a Service Warranty Agreement with a brand-new 10-year Limited Workmanship and Roof Penetration Warranty):

The $11K System Takeover Bundle (the exact 5-tile bundle on the proposal):

Bundled serviceEstimated 25-yr cost avoided
Align Solar Protection (5-yr, $0 deductible, insurance-backed, non-transferable)~$1,500
Manufacturer warranty coordination (OEM claims across 25 yr)~$300
Inverter replacement coordination (1–2 replacements at $3–5K each)~$6,000
Workmanship warranty on existing PV (10-yr Top Tier coverage)~$1,500
Service call coverage (~$500/visit × 4–5 visits)~$2,500
Total~$11,800 — "Over $11K"

How to use it: "On top of the bill math, you're picking up over $11K of bundled services that aren't sold separately. If your inverter fails in year 12, the warranty handling alone is worth a few hundred; the replacement coordination saves $3–5K; the Align contract is $1,500 you'd otherwise pay. It adds up."

Align Solar Protection — the terms (get these right):

Quantifying the rescue value:

ComponentEstimated Value
New 10-year workmanship warranty$1,500–3,000
Inverter replacement avoided via warranty handling$3,500–5,000
Probability-weighted warranty-claim value$2,500–4,000
Performance optimization on existing array$300–800/year
Total expected value over 10–20 years$4,000–7,500+

This is independent of bill savings — the rescue alone can be worth $4,000–7,500.

7. Outage Reality — The Ice City

Why outages happen here. Memphis's signature outage drivers are documented and remembered:

What a battery does — and the honest mechanism. Grid-tied solar shuts off automatically in an outage. A battery with backup keeps essential loads running — refrigerator, medical devices, connectivity, heat or cooling circuits by season — and recharges from solar daily through restoration.

How to pitch it honestly: "February 2023 iced this city over, and Memphis knows what a long restoration feels like better than most towns its size — and every solar roof here shuts off with the first downed line. Whatever your utility ends up paying for exports, backup is the part of the job a battery does that no rate touches — and right now, it's the part we're selling."

8. Hidden Costs Avoided / What You Own vs What You Rent

9. Battery Products

10. Objection Handling

Universal objections (swap in MLGW context) + MLGW-specific objections.

"Why does your proposal show zero savings?" (MLGW-specific — THE register objection; the answer is the pitch)

"Because your utility publishes less about solar than any major utility we work with — the interconnection process is in their charge schedules, but the export terms aren't anywhere you or I can read — and this company doesn't put numbers on paper it hasn't verified. Everyone else in this market will hand you a spreadsheet built on a guess. Ours shows zero, tells you why, and stands on the things that are true no matter what the terms turn out to be: backup power in the city that iced over in 2023 and knows what a long restoration feels like, insulation from the rate curve on the power you keep buying, and one accountable company behind your whole system. When MLGW's terms confirm, your projection updates — upward, because we quoted the floor. You'll never get a call from us walking a number back."

"Can't you just estimate what my exports earn?" (MLGW-specific — the no-guess answer)

"I could, and I won't — that's the whole discipline. TVA-territory arrangements tend to run sub-retail or uncompensated, but 'tends to' isn't your number, and the difference between a guess and a verified figure is the difference between a pitch and a promise. Here's what I'll give you instead of an estimate: the structure, confirmed — TVA power plus the city's markup, an interconnection process with real charges, and a grid fee on solar customers — which means stored power you use yourself beats exporting structurally, whatever the terms say. The size of 'beats' is what we're pinning. The direction is already certain."

"I was in the Green Power Providers program — what does that mean for me?" (the GPP-screen answer)

"It means you hold contracted premium terms from a program that closed at the end of 2019 — and it means your economics live in your contract, not in anyone's template. Before we talk numbers at all, we read your paperwork together. What I can tell you contract-blind: your panels still shut off in every outage, this is still East Tennessee, and the takeover still answers who services your system. The rest waits for your contract, as it should."

"Is there a rebate or tax break?" (the full-honesty answer)

"Here's the complete list, straight: no Tennessee battery rebate, no VPP program that takes our hardware anywhere in this state, no state income tax credit — there's no state income tax to credit against — and the federal credit expired at the end of last year. And one more piece most quotes hide: sales tax here is about nine and a quarter percent, it applies to this equipment, and it's in the price I show you. Add the interconnection charges and the grid fee, both of which I've already told you about. The math that's left is the real math — and in this territory, we're honest enough to show you a zero where other people would show you a guess."

"Why is the loan more than the system price?"

"The cash price is $17,000–18,500 depending on config. Service Finance adds dealer fees bringing the financed amount to about $22,068–23,942. Cash or a HELOC is cheaper if that's an option. There's no rebate here and the federal credit expired — what the payment buys is backup in a region that needs it, the takeover, and over $11K in warranty, service, and inverter coverage — plus whatever the export confirmation adds, disclosed today as exactly that."

11. DO SAY / NEVER SAY

✓ DO SAY✗ NEVER SAY
The register"this proposal claims zero savings on purpose — your utility's rate isn't confirmed, and we don't quote guesses"any savings figure, range, or "typically saves" until the tool carries a confirmed rate
The structure"TVA power plus the city's markup; the interconnection process is in their charge schedules; the export terms aren't published""net metering," or implying exports offset the bill
The terms"being confirmed from primary sources"estimate MLGW's export terms or rate card aloud, even hedged
The charges"the interconnection carries its own charges — exact at application — and the grid fee is four fifty to seven thirty-three"hide either, assume specifics, or claim a battery removes them
The screen"were you ever in Green Power Providers?" — before any economicsdiscuss a GPP home's terms before reading the contract
The upside"when the rate confirms, your projection updates upward — we quoted the floor"turn the confirmation into deadline pressure
Programs"no VPP takes our hardware in Tennessee, no rebate, no state credit — the whole list"invent a program
Taxes"sales tax applies — about nine and a quarter percent — and it's in your price"promise an exemption
Storms"February 2023 iced this city over, and restorations here run long — that's the pattern"invent an MLGW-specific outage count

12. Required Disclosures

13. Quick-Reference Numbers (dated — confirm before quoting)

14. Sell Hard, Sell Honest — the standing rules

Net Metering & Grandfathering Status

Exposed
Verified 2026-07

There is no grandfather protection to promise here. Do NOT tell this customer their terms are locked in — frame the battery as the hedge against terms the utility can change.

1 · Find the customer by install date

Install windowWhat they haveGrandfather termCitation
GPP participants (enrolled before 12/31/2019)Contracted premium terms (GPP legacy)Per GPP contract — terms UNCONFIRMED (confirm from customer's GPP agreement)TVA Green Power Providers program (closed 12/31/2019)
Post-GPP interconnections (2020+)Per-LPC export terms (varies by utility)N/A — current LPC terms applyPer-LPC interconnection agreements

2 · What that cohort has

Confirm the customer's cohort, then be honest that these terms are not contractually locked and can be changed prospectively by the utility. The battery is the hedge against that.

3 · The ongoing effort

No active documented effort reaching existing customers as of 2026-07. Do not pitch a grandfather threat here.

Close on "lock in your own power against rules you don't control" — the battery is the only thing here the utility can't reprice.